Skip to content
AOS Technologiies logo
HomeAOS Cyber Protect · flagship
What We Do
Endpoint protectionEmail securityNetwork securityCloud securityIdentity and accessData protectionManaged security servicesThreat monitoring and detectionVulnerability managementIncident preparation and response coordinationCybersecurity assessmentsIT security reviewsCyber risk managementSecurity strategyCompliance supportBackup and recoveryBusiness resilience
ProductsEndpoint and network securityEmail and collaboration securityCloud and SaaS securityIdentity and access securityData protectionMonitoring and threat detectionVendor portfoliosSolutionsCybersecurity insightsSecurity news and updatesBlogs and articlesCybersecurity guidesCase studies and scenariosFrequently asked questionsCompany overviewOur approachTechnology partnersWhy choose AOSContact usCareersCustomer LoginGet Protected

Illustrative product stack

Zero Trust, SASE & Secure Remote Access Stack

Traditional VPNs can place users on a broad network, while cloud apps and remote workers require consistent access controls from many locations. A new access platform may help, but can duplicate existing Microsoft, firewall or browser controls.

This page shows possible product roles and alternatives, not a fixed bill of materials. Final selection depends on your existing infrastructure, risk profile, budget, licences, technical requirements and compatibility.

Discuss This Solution Request a Technology Consultation

The business problem

Why this security area matters

Secure access architecture uses identity, application context and policy to grant appropriate access. SASE and SSE combine different network and security functions; the exact capabilities vary by supplier and licensing.

How organisations become exposed

Broad remote access, unmanaged devices, inconsistent MFA and unclear application ownership can create unnecessary access paths. Migrating access systems also affects user productivity and critical services.

Who should consider this stack?

Hybrid workforces, distributed sites, organisations modernising legacy VPN, businesses with private applications and teams reviewing remote access after cloud migration.

How to compare options

  • • Compatibility with existing infrastructure and licences.
  • • Security requirements, coverage and integration needs.
  • • Operational overhead, alert ownership and support requirements.
  • • Implementation effort and budget, confirmed in a tailored proposal.

Inside the stack

Possible components and their roles

A candidate configuration for discussion. Core options, alternatives and optional layers are labelled so competing products are not presented as a default bundle.

Layer 01core option

Check Point

Check Point SASE and Private Access

SASE and Zero Trust access

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Check Point portfolio options for private and internet access and secure browsing.

How it fits & relationship

May complement existing firewall/network controls, subject to endpoint and identity integration.

Authorised UK Check Point partner

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 02alternative

Check Point

Remote Access VPN

Secure remote connectivity

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Existing or new VPN option for defined remote-access use cases.

How it fits & relationship

May remain appropriate where the access model and controls meet requirements.

Authorised UK Check Point partner

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 03optional

Microsoft

Microsoft Entra access capabilities

Identity-aware access

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential identity and conditional-access layer for Microsoft environments.

How it fits & relationship

Complements application access decisions; does not alone replace all network or web security.

Technology ecosystem; no partner authorisation claimed

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 04alternative

Zscaler

Zero Trust Exchange

SSE and Zero Trust access

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential market alternative for secure internet/private app access.

How it fits & relationship

Evaluate as an alternative secure-access platform; do not deploy alongside another full SASE suite without a need.

Not a confirmed AOS vendor relationship or offering.

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 05alternative

Netskope

Netskope One

SSE and cloud access security

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential market alternative for cloud and user access controls.

How it fits & relationship

Assess against existing browser, identity and web security controls.

Not a confirmed AOS vendor relationship or offering.

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

How the stack works together

From visibility to continuous improvement

  1. 01Map users, devices, private applications, internet destinations and current VPN use.
  2. 02Define access policy by user, device posture and application requirement.
  3. 03Select an existing or target platform and validate identity and endpoint dependencies.
  4. 04Pilot limited user groups and applications before migration.
  5. 05Retain or retire old access paths only after testing and support planning.

Example architecture to assess

First assess existing VPN, identity, endpoint and cloud controls. A traditional VPN can remain suitable for some use cases. Where app-level access or converged policy is needed, evaluate one SASE/SSE/Zero Trust option; Check Point is the confirmed partner option. Microsoft access controls may complement, not automatically replace, it.

Alternatives and optional layers

Check Point, existing VPN, Microsoft Entra-related controls and other products may suit different access cases. Zscaler, Netskope, Palo Alto Prisma Access and Cisco Secure Access are not confirmed AOS offerings or partnerships.

How AOS can help

Advice, scope and delivery boundaries

AOS provides secure access and workspace security options including SASE, Zero Trust network access, private and internet access, enterprise browser and SaaS/browser protection. Product selection, identity integration, device requirements, licensing and migration support are confirmed in scope.

Questions & answers

Frequently asked questions

Is SASE the same as SSE?

The terms describe related but different scopes. SSE typically focuses on security services; SASE combines security with networking functions. Product definitions vary, so compare actual features.

Should we replace our VPN?

Not automatically. Review access needs, controls, user experience and application dependencies before deciding.

Does Zero Trust mean no trust at all?

It means access is evaluated using explicit policy and context rather than assuming broad trust based on network location. It is an architecture approach, not a single product.

Related product stacks and services

Identity & privileged access →Network & firewall security →Cloud security →Technology Partners →

Find the Right Security Stack for Your Business

Every organisation has a different security environment. Talk to AOS Technologiies about your requirements and explore a technology stack designed around your business.

Discuss Your Requirements